Home News JAMB justifies UNILAG’s post-UTME cut-off mark

JAMB justifies UNILAG’s post-UTME cut-off mark

0
307

The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board has said the 250 marks outlined by the University of Lagos as its cut-off marks for the 2015 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination is justified.

The Board said the mark is aimed at ensuring that Nigerian universities admit only the top best in line with international best practices.

Organic Creame

The spokesperson for JAMB, Dr. Fabian Benjamin, said this in a statement on Sunday in Abuja.

JAMB said it was “aware that some universities have their own admission cut-off marks acceptable by it for courses they offered.

The organisation, however, maintained that the national cut-off marks of 180 for universities and 150 for polytechnics, Colleges of Education and Innovative Enterprise institutions in the 2015 UTME, remained the bench mark for 2015 admission exercise.

It added that the decision to have a national acceptable cut-off marks during its recent policy meeting was to serve as a guide and pruning mechanism to give the tertiary institutions qualitative candidates to choose from a pool of candidates desirous of tertiary education.

JAMB, however, said universities and other levels of tertiary institutions were at liberty to go higher, but not lower, depending on their peculiarities and the performance of candidates that chose them, provided these cut off marks were uniformly applied to all candidates based on existing admission criteria by proprietors of these institutions.

While promising that no candidate would be denied any right to aspire to tertiary education, JAMB said it was aware that some universities had their own admission cut-off marks acceptable for courses they offered.

It said, “The policy witnessed in UNILAG is aimed at ensuring that our universities admit only the top best as done globally. Please be informed that JAMB ensures that these institutions apply these cut-off marks uniformly across all candidates without discrimination.

“The decision of JAMB on the print-out for this year’s exercise was done in good faith not to jeopardise the rights of candidates due to individual cut-off set by some Nigerian tertiary institutions.

“Those candidates, who do not meet the cut-off marks of such institutions will be placed in needy institutions within their geopolitical zone depending on available space in such institutions. The aim is to accommodate as many candidates as possible instead of just pushing them to schools we know abinitio does not have the carrying capacity to admit all.

“For instance, UNILAG with a carrying capacity of about 9,000, has over 60,000 applying to it. The question is: what happens to the over 50,000? We have other institutions like that and what we are doing is to ensure that the balance are also placed in other needy institutions.”

Latest News
Kill Terrorists, Bandits Instantly, Defence Minister Urges Security Agencies, Says Insecurity To Become History SoonRethinking How Nigeria Supports SME GrowthFrom Nutrition To National Security: A Governance Lesson In Coordination & OwnershipStanbic IBTC Capital Named Nigeria's Best Investment Bank at 2026 Global Banking and Finance Review AwardsNNPC Seals Six Gas Deals To Boost Industrialisation, Energy SecuritySenate Queries N943m Allowances Paid to North-West Development Commission BoardStanbic IBTC Bank's Economic Forum Charts Nigeria's Path Through A Shifting Global EconomyTHE YEWA AWORI SOCIO-ECONOMIC BLUEPRINTS FOR THE YAYI ERA AND BEYONDEMHF Opens Heritage Event Hall, Unveils Vision For Africa’s Premier Music Heritage CentreNigeria’s Youngest Chartered Accountant, 16-Year-Old Danielle Osasere, Honoured At MFM Prayer CityThe Kick Of A Dying Horse: Rejecting The Retrogressive Agents Of Darkness In YEWA-AWORI LandNigerians Must Embrace Production, Entrepreneurship To Become Great- Emir of DutseTASFUED Holds Formal Investiture Ceremony for Sixth Substantive Vice-ChancellorOlodo Uprising: Carter Efe mirrors our collective disaster“I’m No Fraudster” — Adeyemi Fires Back at Presidency Over PFIPC Controversy