NDDC: Lori-Ogbebor’s Suit Against Buhari, Malami, Others For Hearing Nov 2

The suit filed by rights activist, Chief Rita Lori-Ogbebor, at the Federal High Court, Abuja, restraining President Muhammadu Buhari, Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami and President of the Senate, Ahmad Lawan, from inaugurating a new board for the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) pending the public release of the forensic audit report, comes up on Tuesday, November 2.

Also joined in the lawsuit are the Minister of Niger Delta Affairs, Godswill Akpabio, and Clerk of the National Assembly, as third and fifth defendants.

The President, Malami and Lawan are the first, second and fourth defendants in the case. In the originating summons dated July 26, 2021, in suit No: FHC/ABJ/744/2021 filed by her solicitors, Patrick Oganwu & Associates, the plaintiff wants the court to stop the defendants from raising a new board for the commission except the forensic audit report is made public.

She raised a number of questions for the court to determine, including whether by the provisions of the NDDC Act 2017, the first defendant can exercise his powers, control and supervision over the NDDC by issuing a directive ordering a forensic audit of the activities of the NDDC from 2001 to 2019 and whether the first defendant is bound to receive the report of the forensic audit and act on same before taking any further step in constituting or reconstituting the NDDC board.

Consequently, she sought the following reliefs:
“An order or injunction restraining the first defendant from constituting or reconstituting the board for the NDDC or appointing anybody or person into the board pending the completion of the forensic audit ordered by the first defendant and a receipt of the said report from the third defendant.

“An order of this court restraining the first defendant from acting on any advice with regards to constituting the NDDC board without receiving a copy of the audited forensic report and thereafter immediately issuing a White Paper on same.

“An order restraining the fourth defendant from receiving a nomination from the first defendant with a view to screening and confirming the appointment of any person or persons as board members of the NDDC pending the completion and presentation of the audit (report) ordered by the first defendants.

“An order restraining the third defendant, by himself or anybody, whosoever acting through him, from interfering with the conduct of the forensic audit in a manner inconsistent with the order of the first defendant.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here